Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656

Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760

current issue

June – July 2026 : Labels READ ONLINE

RECENT TWEETS

The Watchtower part III

June 01 2026
© Chris Bird © Chris Bird

The final chapter of a story of power and order. Our protagonist, Elias, has had his behaviour influenced by a mysterious tower, but is slowly getting back control. By Joseph Hickman

Issue 160 and 161 published the first sections of The Watchtower, an atmospheric, mysterious story revolving around Elias and a tower. 
The tower controls much of Elias’s behaviour in part I, before its influence begins to wane in part II. 
You can read parts I and II on the website: 
www.thepavement.org.uk/stories/2806
www.thepavement.org.uk/stories/2824


The Fissure Spreads 


Elias returned to the tower, though “return” felt like a borrowed word. The walls recognised him, of course, but hesitated. Corridors paused mid-breath as if uncertain how to react. The ledger of his deviations quivered faintly in unseen spaces.

He carried no tools, no weapons, no manifesto. He carried only the knowledge that a fissure, once found, could be shared without ever being named. Small acts rippled outward: a gaze held too long, a question asked but not answered, a phrase allowed to drift into forbidden conclusion.

Others noticed. Some subtly, some as if sensing a tremor in the foundation of their own floors. Shadows shifted. Glances lingered. One child, smaller than Elias once was, dared to hum a tune the tower had never sanctioned. The bell-tone rang faintly, but no punishment followed. The corridor exhaled.

Elias discovered that the fissure was infectious. Not violently. Not loudly. But persistently. Each quiet defiance, each act of thinking without justification, bent the architecture slightly. Walls lost their rigidity. Ceilings hesitated. Floors breathed.

And yet the tower endured, as all bureaucracies do. It catalogued. It rearranged. It hummed. It waited for missteps. But now it waited in dialogue, not dominance. Its corridors were still watchful, but less certain of what was permitted.

Elias did not seek to destroy it. He had learned that destruction is easy, but perilous. He sought only to remind the tower – and himself – that it could be questioned, challenged and reshaped.

He walked among others now, silently encouraging fissures without announcing them. Some smiled faintly, sensing a possibility they had never named. Others pretended not to notice. Still, the air itself seemed to pulse with the tension of thought unmonitored.

There was no declaration. No revolution. No sudden collapse. Only a quiet, accumulating insistence: that freedom could exist even within walls, that choice could persist even under surveillance, that the weight of obedience could be lifted, however slightly.

Elias stood at a balcony once more. The sun dipped toward an indifferent horizon. The wind carried voices he could almost hear – whispers of courage, murmurs of defiance, the quiet laughter of minds beginning to reclaim themselves.

He realised that hope was not a promise. It was a fissure, small and fragile, that widened with care, attention and persistence.

It required no leaders, no permission, no architects. Only those willing to claim it.

And in that space, the tower – and the world beyond it – waited, imperfectly, for what might come next.

Elias smiled. Not because the path was clear, not because the walls had surrendered, but because for the first time, he could see the possibility of movement. The possibility of change. The possibility that, however small, resistance could endure.

The tower still hummed, still catalogued, still rearranged itself. But the hum no longer dictated the rhythm of his spine. The ledger no longer bound his choices. He was aware now of the weight of freedom and the responsibility it demanded. And he would bear it, step by step, corridor by corridor.

The fissure would spread. And in that slow, careful light, the tower was no longer invincible.

BACK ISSUES